Free Speech is Messy

For Pacific Standard, I write about the free speech complexities of the upcoming “free speech week.” First, the organizers didn’t even ask the speakers or book the spaces before they started crying oppression. Second, “security concerns” forced the Anthropology department to cancel a long-planned talk. I write: “Thanks to “safety concerns,” the annual distinguished lecture … Continue ReadingFree Speech is Messy

Peter Singer, Milo, and Murray – The Slippery Slope Fallacy

Friends, we’ve been hacked. Giggling GOP student groups have hacked the free speech pieties of my generation. It’s murky ahead. But recognize we’ve been hacked. — David M. Perry (@Lollardfish) March 7, 2017 In the ensuing debates about platforms and protests, which will be extremely complex and often uncomfortable, forcing us to choose between abstract … Continue ReadingPeter Singer, Milo, and Murray – The Slippery Slope Fallacy

Peter Singer: The Milo of Philosophers

I’m not okay with #disability hate being confused with #science https://t.co/fgVSHyi3WC @Lollardfish @stevesilberman @RoseUnwin — Louise Kinross (@LouiseKinross) February 28, 2017 Thanks to Louise for alerting me to the Journal of Practical Ethics doing a glossy Q&A with Peter Singer. Singer is a bigot. Philosophy embraces him as a titan of the field, letting his ableism … Continue ReadingPeter Singer: The Milo of Philosophers

Humans on Campus: Washington before and after Milo

The other day I suggested that a person being shot at a Milo protest in Washington deserved at least as much coverage as, say, Oberlin students arguing about sandwiches … or even the property damage and action at Berkeley. Because someone was shot. Now The Chronicle of Higher Education has (paywalled, but this link might work) … Continue ReadingHumans on Campus: Washington before and after Milo